How the incorrect classification of income as a grant can cost NPO’s millions 

Written by Nkamo Thubakgale, MaxProf Marketing Communication Associate

Introduction

VAT mistakes can haunt organisations for decades, the SLGGM case is proof. Nearly two decades later, a non-profit organisation is paying the price for VAT missteps. 

The case of SLGGM v CSARS (Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services) 

The issue on this case was whether the amounts received by SLGGM from the GDE (Gauteng Department of Education) constituted grant funding and thus zero-rated or were received for services rendered and thus are subject to VAT at the standard rate SLGGM argued that its funding was a grant (zero-rated) while SARS deemed it standard rated. 

  • The court ruled that GDE made the payments to SLGGM for services rendered, citing itemised invoices as proof of services rendered. 
  • SLGGM is now liable for an amount of R93 million in assessments plus penalties, nearly 20 years after the fact. 
  •  

The court emphasised that grants cannot be invoiced. Invoices are evidence of services supplied, not gratuitous transfers.

Key Lessons for Organisations

This case highlights several critical lessons for non-profits, welfare organisations, and any entity working with government funding:

  • Classification matters: Misinterpreting whether funding is a grant or service payment can lead to massive liabilities.
  • Documentation is decisive: Courts will prioritise written records (like invoices) over oral testimony.
  • Grant vs Service distinction: A grant is a gratuitous transfer with no quid pro quo. If services are supplied, VAT applies.
  • Credibility counts: Inconsistent testimony or evasive evidence can undermine a case.

How MaxProf Can Help

MaxProf bridges the gap between legal definitions and practical compliance: 

  • Documentation Alignment: Ensuring invoices, reporting, and records reflect the right VAT treatment. 
  • Risk Management: Identifying potential pitfalls early to prevent costly disputes with SARS. 

Conclusion

VAT compliance for NPOs is complex, but essential. MaxProf stands ready to guide organisations through these challenges, protecting them from financial risk while enabling them to focus on their mission. 

Contact MaxProf today to safeguard your organisation’s compliance. 

Recent Posts

QI Logistics v SARS
QI Logistics v SARS
MaxProf Continues Its Drive To Strengthen Local Government Revenue Sustainability
VAT Refunds Under Review: Why Reconciliations and Audit Trails Matter
MaxProf at the CFO Leadership Summit 2026
MaxProf Annual Charity Golf Day
MaxProf Annual Charity Golf Day
MaxProf at the Everest Golf Day
MaxProf at the Everest Golf Day
MaxProf Attends SALGA Provincial Members' Assemblies in Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Northern Cape and Eastern Cape
MaxProf Takes Part in the 2026 CEO Cycle Challenge
How Data-Driven VAT Enforcement Is Changing Municipal Compliance
VAT on Fringe Benefits
VAT on Fringe Benefits

MAXIMISE YOUR PROFIT

Book your appointment today.

BOOK APPOINTMENT

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website